The following are examples of how the HLR may be used.  Click on a topic to see more information.
  1. Placement/Need for Services
  2. Health Promotion and Fitness Interventions
  3. Strategic Planning
  4. Research


I: Placement/Need for Services

Placement of residents in a particular unit within a CCRC will depend on matching the resident’s need with the services offered on a particular unit. The CCRC in this example has two assisted living levels. The first Assisted Living Unit (ALU) houses those residents who have some cognitive problems but require minimum levels of assistance with daily activities. The second unit called Residential Unit (RU) houses those residents who need more assistance with daily activities of living but do not have severe cognitive decline.

EXAMPLE A

Mrs. Jones, an 89-year-old widow has been living alone in an independent apartment in a CCRC since her husband’s sudden heart attack a year ago.  During the past six months, concerns arose about her ability to continue to live independently. To evaluate her case, she was administered the HLR.

Relevant Physician Data: 

history of repeated treatments for depression.

Relevant HLR Data: 

Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) 22/30
Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) 5/12
Activities of Daily Living (ADL) 19/21
Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) 9/14

Outcome:  

Low scores on the MMSE and the GDS resulted in the recommendation to move Mrs. Jones to the Assisted Living Unit.


EXAMPLE B

Ms. Weber is 92 years old and living in an independent apartment in a CCRC. After numerous falls, the staff decided that she needed to be evaluated with the HLR. 

Relevant Physician Data: Frailty with multiple chronicity.

Relevant HLR Data:

Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) 26/30
Activities of Daily Living (ADL) 11/21
Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) 6/14
Fear of Falling 35/100
Fall risk score 5/12

Ms. Weber was not able to get to the dining room by herself, and needed assistance with toilet transfer.

Outcome: 

Low scores on the ADL, IADL, Fear of Falling, and Fall Risk scores resulted in the recommendation to transfer Ms. Weber to the Residential Unit.


II. Health Promotion and Fitness Interventions

As older adults enter a facility, functional fitness levels are evaluated with the HLR and recommendations for participation in appropriate physical activity program(s) are made.  Progress can be monitored with the periodic use of appropriate assessments of the HLR. Examples of successful Larksfield Place programs: 

  • Annual Functional Fitness Assessment

  • Be Fit to Drive

  • Fall Avoidance

  • Reconditioning Programs

  • Living with Pulmonary Limitations

  • Quality of Life Programs and Services

  • Reconditioning Programs

  • Strength with VitaBand

  • Water Fitness

  • Yoga

EXAMPLE A

Ruth B - age 84 showed the following performance data for the years 2004 through 2006. After her initial screening with the HLR, Ruth participated in a general fitness program consisting of stretching and walking exercises. Her second screening a year later detected an increased number of falls and reductions in her fall efficacy, muscle strength, and mobility. After reviewing these results, it was recommended to Ruth that she participate in a Better Balance class designed specifically to improve strength and balance by targeting visual, vestibular, and somatosensory perception using foam mats. After one year of participation in this program, Ruth had regained her strength and mobility  and had avoided suffering a fall. At this time, Ruth is engaging in a more challenging physical intervention program to further improve her strength and balance. This class utilizes large balls that participants sit and lie on to enhance sensory perception and muscle strength. Subsequent assessments using the HLR will determine Ruth's progress and the effectiveness of this program.

Assessment

2004

2005

2006

ADL

18

16

19

IADL

12

12

12

Number of falls

0

2

0

Fall efficacy

90

65

93

Up-and-Go (sec)

5.2

6.7

5.5

Lower Body ROM (in)

-2

-2

-3

Upper Body ROM (in)

-4

-5

-5

Arm strength

15

11

16

Leg strength

14

9

15

Body mass index

33

32

32

EXAMPLE B

Residents that participated in both the 2005 and 2006 Functional Fitness Assessment
increased their grip strength, but overall the 2006 grip strength declined from 2005

Blue = 2005 All participants
Red = participants who did the assessments in both 05 and 06
Yellow = 2006 All participants

EXAMPLE C

Residents that participated in both the 2005 and 2006 Functional Fitness Assessment increased
 their walking speed by 16 plus yards or 2.26 mph to 2.35 mph.

Overall the 2006 walking speed was 418.12 yds or
 2.38 miles an increase of 20.66 yds or .12 mph over the 2005 walking speed

.    


  III. Strategic Planning

Data from the HLR can be very useful both from a management perspective and a planning perspective with the board of directors. For example, the graph below was generated with HLR data. The increased slope of the chronicity data suggest that residents entering the CCRC are more chronic, which will have implications for planning future services and staffing needs. The decreasing slope of the Mini-Mental State Exam suggests that expansion of the dementia unit is not needed at this time.

 


IV. Research

Analysis of HLR data has been used in numerous research projects in conjunction with academic entities. 
See the History page to view abstracts.

  Sign up for a free trial membership now!

 
 

©2000 Wesley Retirement Communities, Inc.
For comments regarding this Web site and its contents please contact
HEALTH & LIFESTYLE REVIEW
All rights reserved